Lindo Wing yesterday,
Pro-Kremlin newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda carried
the claims which were made by various Russian women.
They said that it was "impossible" for the Duchess of
Cambridge to look so good immediately after the birth,
also questioning whether the baby was in fact born days
before.
One woman said:
"If she really gave birth naturally, it was surely some
days ago.
Another added: "She gave birth three days ago. They
reported it only now. Look at the baby - she does not
look
likea newborn at all.
"She is at least three days old. There is nothing which
would help a woman, even if she gave birth with the
help of best doctors, stand up five hours after giving
birth - and leave the clinic on her feet."
The claims became even more ridiculous when one
woman said that Kate Middleton had not even given
birth to the new princess herself.
She said: "It was a surrogate mother who gave birth but
not her. Kate must have been wearing a fake belly
showing to the people that she was pregnant.It is just
not real to walk yourself several hours after birth and
wave to the public in white dress.If you ever gave birth,
try to recall yourself in three or four hours later.Even if
the birth was easy, women just want to sleep and sleep
for several hours. This is a fairy tale of a family of show
offs.
Another said: "I thought this too - that the baby is at
least 7-10 days old.
"First of all, she is too big for a newborn, and secondly,
the face is smooth and pale."
UK Mirror
No comments:
Post a Comment